User talk:135.180.144.240

June 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Mark Danner has been reverted. Your edit here to Mark Danner was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pakT7fK9VKI) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:38, 25 June 2021 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

July 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Problem of Hell, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Nobody ( talk ) 17:27, 24 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Please explain how my edit was a deviation from the style befitting an encyclopedia. Your objection makes no sense without adequate explanation, which you have not provided. Tomabird (talk) 05:13, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * @Tomabird In the edit, this part didn't make any sense to me:
 * Also if this was you. Why did you make the edit while logged out? Nobody  ( talk ) 05:19, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I had forgotten my password, which I just changed. I can redo the reference if you like, as i can see that it is not in standard format. I don’t feel his viewpoint has any less relevance than William Blake’s- in fact it is much clearer and representative of an entire theological perspective, as opposed to the idiosyncratic perspective of William Blake, which is not. Tomabird (talk) 05:32, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * @Tomabird I had no issue with the content itself. I only saw that weird reference which looked to me like the ref tag was placed at the wrong place. Feel free to restore the content and fix the reference.  Nobody  ( talk ) 05:35, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok thanks for clarifying. Tomabird (talk) 05:46, 25 July 2023 (UTC)