User talk:135.19.91.161

September 2020
User: Please edit the page about the party appropriately. There are many sources and facts demonstrating that Coalition Avenir Québec isn’t a conservative, centre-right and especially not a right wing party, especially not in reality or in practice. (previous edit by 135.19.91.161)
 * Please provide those sources, then. As the editor adding these ideas to the article, it is your responsibility to find reliable sources to back it up, especially when many scholarly sources say otherwise. Ezhao02 (talk) 02:14, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Ezhao02. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Coalition Avenir Québec, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ezhao02 (talk) 00:47, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Coalition Avenir Québec, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ezhao02 (talk) 22:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Ezhao02 (talk) 00:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello, I'm LuK3. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to List of vice presidents of the United States have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. --   LuK3      (Talk)   20:27, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ST47 (talk) 20:28, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.