User talk:135.23.232.202

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (135.23.232.202) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 07:10, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey, I'm not actually a "new Wikipedian". I know that the welcoming is well intended, but it is my personal belief that it can often be a waste of resources, especially if users are trying to increase their edit count.  Welcome messages don't actually improve the encyclopedia.  While people might think that a friendly form letter might give wikipedia editors some sort of warm feeling, there is absolutely no evidence that it in anyway improve the quality of wikipedia as an encyclopedia.
 * I'm not sure if you've ever read them, but I really do believe in the 5 pillars of wikipedia! The main reason I prefer to contribute as an unregistered user is that Wikipedia is not a social networking service.  Wikipedia should not, in my opinion, be a forum for outside, unrelated politics but for some reason it happens.
 * I see that you would like to be an admin. I recommend avoiding potentially contentions material on your user page if it is unrelated to wikipedia in anyway.  Displaying that you oppose the POTUS on your user page does not improve Wikipedia.  This sort of content is probably better suited for your facebook page or blog.
 * I see that you would like to be an admin. I recommend avoiding potentially contentions material on your user page if it is unrelated to wikipedia in anyway.  Displaying that you oppose the POTUS on your user page does not improve Wikipedia.  This sort of content is probably better suited for your facebook page or blog.
 * I see that you would like to be an admin. I recommend avoiding potentially contentions material on your user page if it is unrelated to wikipedia in anyway.  Displaying that you oppose the POTUS on your user page does not improve Wikipedia.  This sort of content is probably better suited for your facebook page or blog.


 * User categories (subcategories of Category:Wikipedians) are intended to assist collaboration between users and not as a way for people to display their political affiliations.
 * Knowing that a wikipedian's interested in a specific topic can be useful for collaboration but knowing that a user has very strong political opinions may actually impede civil collaboration.


 * As per Overcategorization/User_categories, the Category:Wikipedians_who_are_against_Donald_Trump is not appropriate. I will nominate it for deletion.  If you are interested in participating in the discussion you can here.

135.23.232.202 (talk) 09:27, 10 August 2017 (UTC)