User talk:136.165.194.11

November 2022
Hello, I'm Equine-man. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Peaceful transition of power have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Equine-man (talk) 16:52, 9 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The article is blatantly false and highly politicized, and is misleading information. Someone who is trying to learn about a topic shouldn't have to read about someone's inane political opinions. 136.165.194.11 (talk) 16:59, 9 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Please read WP:VERIFIABILITY to understand how Wikipedia aims to present information based on reliable sources. You could start a new section at Talk:Peaceful transition of power if you don't understand, or disagree with, the reversion of your recent edits. Please also focus on specific content - expressions such as "blatantly false", "inane political opinions" don't help to focus on claimed facts in the article. The expression "politicized" is valid, in the sense that peaceful transition of power is a political subject, by definition - it's about how people make decisions about who has the power to make decisions for a society. Political topics necessarily contain facts about politics. Boud (talk) 23:10, 9 November 2022 (UTC)