User talk:136.167.207.76

November 2018
Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that in this edit to Shroud of Turin, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 18:34, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Mathglot. I noticed that in this subsequent edit to Shroud of Turin, you removed some content in a section which has a citation to a reliable source (Catholic Encyclopedia), and added other content which is not supported by that reference. Your use of an edit summary was exemplary, but does not make up for the fact that this edit appears to represent original research or a personal point of view on your part, and so it has been reverted again. Consider following the procedures outlined at BOLD, revert, discuss cycle to gain consensus on the talk page first. At this point, after two attempts to add this material and two reverts, a further attempt without discussion might be viewed as edit warring. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mathglot (talk) 22:54, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Shroud of Turin edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Shroud of Turin. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Adding "I honestly think it is better this way," into your edit summary is no justification for edit warring. You have been warned about this twice already, this is the third time. Consensus is a core principle of editing on Wikipedia; please stop insisting on your preferred version, and take it up on the Talk page of the article. Mathglot (talk) 19:11, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.