User talk:137.122.64.155

February 2018
Hello. Some of your recent changes, such as the ones you made to screamo, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. ''Changes without consensus or sources to back up will be reverted. Per WP:NPOV, WP:CITE, and WP:CONS'' Issan Sumisu (talk) 21:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Much of the information is from the same Alternative Press article; too much information from the same source; also Crunkcore is not a screamo subgenre, but another musical genre with screaming. If that was the case there would be a ton of music genres added to the page ;)

Assuming you're talking about the "pop screamo" section, there is in fact five sources backing that information up. And while I also agree that crunkcore shouldn't be included as derivative simply because it includes screaming, that is unfortunately sourced and thus removing it conflicts with our neutral point of view Issan Sumisu (talk) 21:48, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Alterntaive Press is not a credible source. And really there were 2 soruces as Alt Press was extremely oversourced. For a consensus on Crunkcore Go on some Skramz forums and ask the same question and you'll see :) Also by that logic we should include Nu Metal, Death Metal, Hardcore and everything else! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandon Rohan Music (talk • contribs) 21:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Alternative Press is considered a reliable source as well as the other sources that backup pop screamo's inclusion (MTV and Metal Sucks) and crunkcore's inclusion (The Guardian, Though co., The Badger Herald and Student Life). Furthermore, consensus on forums external to Wikipedia does not have any impact and does not hold up on Wikipedia itself. Issan Sumisu (talk) 22:06, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Okay! I think I see where you are coming from - while I will uphold that mainstream publications or publications about METAL (screamo is not a Metal subgenre) do not have the most researched information or understanding of Screamo - I see you have based your criteria on the existence of sources which this information may appear to have. But "Screamo" is mentioned in name only by the writers. What I meant by "proof" was interviews of Crunkcore band members listing or citing Screamo bands as influences on them and for this, there is no evidence that I have yet to see documented to prove any link between Screamo and Crunkcore anymore than say Nu Metal. Keep in mind there are many sources that list Bring Me the Horizon and Asking Alexandria as Screamo when they are not and when you look at influences they cite in documented interviews they are not Screamo bands who were their influencers. It's the same thing with these "Crunkcore" bands. If you can find an interview that has Crunkcore members citing Screamo bands than that is good enough proof, however, until then such a link has yet to be proved and presenting Crunkcore on the page is misinformation. I like tons of different genres and do not hold any one genre as my personal protective possesion as some elitist do, I love seeing the links between genres and think that is what is cool about how music is linked. I even listen to "Pop-Screamo" too like the first the Used album and Thursday so I am in no way a "tr00 skramz" elitist (in fact I included Pop-Screamo as a genre derivative in one of my edits which was taken down!), I see the links between music and what binds and connects the styles. The thing here was that Crunkcore and Screamo are not linked. In fact Crunkcore did not used to be part of this article even 6 months ago despite it exisitng as a music form since 2009. I actually went to restore the article as it was to its orignal form and thought the Crunkcore addition was a joke or vandalism to the page. I only want to help the integrity and accuracy of the article. I learned a lot about music through wiki pages and want to see the best possible information for future learners! :)

March 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nashville, Tennessee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Acebulf (talk) 01:28, 6 March 2018 (UTC) You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alice (given name). TJRC (talk) 21:10, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Battle of Midway. Your edits vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  02:08, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cortinarius caperatus. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. J ACKINTHE  B  OX   • TALK 00:30, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Lauri Törni, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 03:16, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2018
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 17:20, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Anti-abortion movement— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk  22:14, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Anti-abortion movement. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Everedux  (talk)  22:15, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Anti-abortion movement, you may be blocked from editing.  Everedux  (talk)  22:18, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Anti-abortion movement. Wikipelli Talk  22:20, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Lofty   abyss  22:23, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Renfrew, Ontario
Hello. Your recent edit to Renfrew, Ontario appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:28, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Renfrew, Ontario. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:32, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hashs (talk) 23:18, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brantford Collegiate Institute, you may be blocked from editing. → Emɑdix  ©  14:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Matthews, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 15:35, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2020
Hi,

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits, and edits that go against a consensus that was reached on a talk page. Thanks! Smith0124 (talk) 00:31, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, I'm Volten001. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to List of My Hero Academia characters have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Volten 001 ☎ 05:34, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm FozzieHey. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of University of Ottawa people, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. FozzieHey (talk) 18:25, 6 April 2022 (UTC)