User talk:137.163.18.136

November 2018
Hello, I'm William Avery. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Maximilian Kolbe have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. William Avery (talk) 11:04, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * Let's be honest here, who even gives a hsit about those warnings? At this point no one to be honest. Half of the users on this IP don't even know that the fucking talk even exists. The people who vandalize WIkipedia from this IP don't give a shit if this IP is banned, nor do they care enough to check the warnings. What is the point of letting people edit from an anonymous IP, when the majority of people who are editing from an IP usually take their time to vandalize, rather than procreate, and the majority of the people who actually want to contribute make an account anyways. Why the hell does Wikimedia Foundation find it useful for people editing without being logged in to even be able to edit? Thank you for you time,, and I am personally sorry for all the shit this wretched IP has done. 137.163.18.136 (talk) 13:03, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Formula One. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:30, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:35, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello, I'm ButterCashier. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Arecaceae have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ButterCashier (talk) 11:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Doug Hickey—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 07:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Barred owl. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —  DVRT ed (Talk) 13:06, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Barred owl, you may be blocked from editing. —  DVRT ed (Talk) 13:10, 17 March 2023 (UTC)