User talk:137.186.18.106

October 2022
Hello, I'm LuK3. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Claude Monet have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. --   LuK3      (Talk)   12:42, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Claude Monet. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wesoree (Talk) 12:46, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Claude Monet, you may be blocked from editing. Wesoree (Talk) 13:01, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Population I star. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 23:04, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * No this needs a standalone. Do not revert. 137.186.18.106 (talk) 23:09, 29 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Mr Troutman, you reverted this edit citing WP:NASTRO. I wonder which aspect of the guideline, which exclusively concerns astronomical objects, you feel applies to Population I stars. If we were to attempt to apply this guideline for the present article, it would demonstrate prima facie notability. (Our sun is visible by the naked eye, and is a Population I star.) This is probably not the right guideline to cite, but please use more care in the future citing guidelines in reversions. This is not the first time you have been cavalier with Wikipedia guidelines and policies, preferring bullying and threats to actual engagement. Tito Omburo (talk) 11:49, 30 October 2023 (UTC)