User talk:137.222.114.184

November 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ellie (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ellie (film) was changed by 137.222.114.184 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965341 on 2011-11-04T01:32:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:32, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Cee Lo Green, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sky Machine  ( ++ ) 22:04, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Paradise (Coldplay song) appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk 20:22, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.  Velella  Velella Talk 20:22, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Regarding this, the purpose of a BFA is not to stop a live round from exiting the barrel of the rifle, but to create enough gas pressure inside the barrel to allow the firing of a blank round to recycle the bolt so that it loads another blank round from the magazine into the chamber. Hence, without a BFA, the weapon will only fire one shot, after which point you'd have to pull the charging handle to the rear again and manually load the blank rounds one by one. Hence, the experts were saying that claims that the rescue personnel were firing blanks is easily debunked by the fact that no BFAs were visible on the weapons, nor would rescue personnel take the risk of having to take BFAs on and off in the middle of a hostile area where they might be engaged by a real enemy at any time. Hope that helps clear things up. Regards, AzureCitizen (talk) 22:48, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * With regards to my BFA edit ( http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jessica_Lynch&diff=527610387&oldid=527609694), you are indeed right. Having never fired without one I completely forgot.. my bad. Thanks for re-editing it back, and sorry for what must have come across as a seemingly arrogant edit. All the best. --137.222.114.184
 * No problem, and clearly your intentions were to improve the article - it's a subtle point that other people have probably missed as well. Thanks for the courtesy... Regards, AzureCitizen (talk) 03:21, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

April 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to 5 Seconds of Summer has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: 5 Seconds of Summer was changed by 137.222.114.184 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.919595 on 2013-04-29T19:48:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:48, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Bristol has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bristol was changed by 137.222.114.184 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.92988 on 2013-05-08T10:50:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:50, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bristol, you may be blocked from editing. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:02, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Culture of Bristol, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:22, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * You have been asked to stop this vandalism. Please do so.  If you wish to insert information then get some reliable sources and write in a neutral point of view manner.  This is an encyclopaedia, not a plaything for bored university students. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:11, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruptive editing, as you did at Culture of Bristol. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 12:29, 8 May 2013 (UTC)