User talk:137.222.114.239

June 2013
Hello, I'm Sophus Bie. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Group 11 element without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!  Sophus Bie  (talk) 12:30, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

April 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Mis-Shapes, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Daiyusha (talk) 11:50, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Baroclinity, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 18:50, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to House of Commons of the United Kingdom. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

The correct figures can be seen at the House of Commons website. FDW777 (talk) 16:02, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
Hello, I'm Creffett. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to King's School, Macclesfield—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. creffett (talk) 18:54, 18 January 2020 (UTC)