User talk:137.70.164.228

December 2021
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Kirk Cousins—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 01:28, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

March 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages (including user talk pages) such as Talk:Nanotechnology are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. They are not for general discussion about the article topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. ev iolite  (talk)  17:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello, I'm LilianaUwU. An edit you recently made to Game Grumps seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Liliana UwU (talk / contribs) 19:09, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at GD. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. &mdash; Ingenuity (talk &bull; contribs) 19:06, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at MN. Felida97 (talk) 19:07, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Andethyst. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to GDD—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.  Andethyst  (talk)  17:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism, as done at GDD. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 17:57, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 19:13, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

February 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 62 (number). Conformancenut347 (talk) 21:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 21:35, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.