User talk:137.99.52.136/sandbox

I read an article about kinesthetic learning. I am very heavily a kinesthetic learner over any other type of learning. In my opinion, kinesthetic learning is an important way for many kids to learn that is not used to its fullest extent. Education is important when it is catered to each individual learner so that it can best suit the students. I thought everything was relevant to the topic article. The one part that was a bit of a tangent was the “lack of evidence” section. This section basically says that there is a lack of real evidence on whether or not different people actually do learn in different distinct ways. This section was very different from the rest of the article even though it was related to the theme. Everything in this article is up to date. I think they could add some information about how they test to find out students’ learning styles. This article is not exactly neutral. It says how this is a good thing that can benefit education, but then it also states the lack of evidence behind it. The VARK system (visual, aural, read/write and kinesthetic) is a viewpoint that I thought was underrepresented. I think there could have been a bit more detail on this system as a whole (although the article does link to the VARK Wikipedia page). All of the citations that I clicked on were from journal articles and books that I had to buy online to view. They came from reputable journals that I have heard of. This tells me that the sources used for this article are reliable. I only wish I could read them to see if they line up with the views expressed in the article. Each fact is referenced correctly to a source. There is no bias noted in any spot in the article. The sources all appear to be scientific journals that are not biased, but it is hard to tell since I cannot access the sources.