User talk:138.162.8.59

December 2012
Hello, I'm ChrisGualtieri. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Fire alarm control panel because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:55, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2013
Hello, I'm Vacation9. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bridesmaids (2011 film) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Vaca tion  9  12:53, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2013
Hello, I'm Sodaant. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Lightning because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. SodaAnt Talk 18:20, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=556127632 your edit] to Johnsonville, South Carolina may have broken the syntax by modifying 6 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

June 2013
Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to History of Mac OS, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Yinta n  14:40, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Paradiving (September 6)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:31, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to VP-8 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 11:51, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

WP:AN discussion
I have started a discussion about some edits made from this IP address at Administrators' noticeboard/Archive255. Fram (talk) 08:21, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, I'm The Triple M. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person   on Ronnie Spector, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Triple M 01:39, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

February 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:138.162.8.59, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jeffrd10 (talk) 15:29, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * This is a shared IP as is mentioned above and used by a lot of people. Why would I want to create an account? I see how people are treated. I just don't see the point in having all this garbage on this page. 138.162.8.59 (talk) 15:31, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Because it clearly demonstrates the history of totally disruptive editing emanating from this IP and which I why I'll be reinstating it. Leaky  Caldron  15:33, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Theres only one bad edit for every 20 here so if you want to block it or view that as abuse...whatever. 138.162.8.59 (talk) 15:36, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for trolling, bad faith commenting and other disruption, as you did at WT:RFA. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Legoktm (talk) 19:21, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * Oh really, so are you going to block LeakyCauldren too for their bad faith comments about me being a troll? No you aren't, because this isn't about my comments, this is because of who I am and that I am trying to get admins held accountable. You should be ashamed. 138.162.8.59 (talk) 20:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * BTW, all I have to do is change my IP, so this really doesn't mean anything. Its just a message to not criticise admins. 138.162.8.59 (talk) 20:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Leaky wasn't making bad faith comments. I think Our social policies are not a suicide pact is relevant here. I honestly couldn't care why you still spend time on Wikipedia after the amount of times you've left, but when you start disturbing people who actually are trying to contribute to the project, I do.
 * I realize you have multiple IP addresses, and if you evade your block, I will block them. Legoktm (talk) 00:02, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Your comments on Nina Green
They're ill-informed. I'm willing to e-mail you some history — you know, facts and diffs — if you're willing to swear on the bible that you're interested in them, and willing to take the time to read them (it'll take quite some time). Very likely you're not, and in that case it's hardly worth my trouble. Bishonen &#124; talk 17:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC).
 * No its ok, thanks for the offer though. Even if I read them and provided a profound and well articulated instrospection reminiscent of Twain, Frost or Thoreau, anything I added to the discussion would be disregarded and criticized to pieces so there is no reason for you to waste your time.
 * Be respectful to your superiors...if you have any. --Mark Twain.138.162.8.59 (talk) 17:29, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

That IP wasn't me
Just so you know, that IP you blocked for being me, wasn't me. So now you are blocking IP's who are innocent and accusing them of being me. 138.162.8.58 (talk) 21:38, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

I suppose we'll see how it turns out
I suppose we'll see how the vote turns out. It certainly seems to be in your favor. Of course its pretty easy to change IP's and there are a lot of hotspots in DC wiht free internet. 138.162.8.59 (talk) 21:39, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * As much as I don't care to play whack-a-mole, we both know that unless you effect a serious change in attitude, your socks will be caught and blocked. It isn't like you are suggesting a groundbreaking strategy for ban evasion here.  In truth, Kumioko, all you are accomplishing now is to further undermining any point you were trying to make.  If you actually did care about improving things here, you would realize that firing up ban-evading socks would simply defeat your own cause. You would, in fact, prove everyone you view as an enemy to be right.  Your comments now smack of impotent rage.  IMO, you are probably better off just taking six months off and deciding then if you feel the desire to return. Resolute 21:52, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * You know there are 2 problems with what you are saying. First, its not "my cause" I was trying to help improve the project. Second, I was totally dedicated to the project and you all destroyed that by showing me how truly ugly this place is. 131.171.81.79 (talk) 00:24, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

So I guess you don't really care you blocked innocent editors and accused them of being me
So it appears that you don't care that you blocked a half dozen editors and accused them of being me. I think you need to run the checkuser tool again for the last couple weeks. You might be able to block a lot more innocent editors just to prove how far you are willing to go just to be rid of me and my criticism of Arbcom and admins. 138.162.8.58 (talk) 21:41, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Paradiving


Hello 138.162.8.59. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Paradiving".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 09:04, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to USS Mahan (DDG-72), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Widr (talk) 17:04, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nyttend (talk) 16:34, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, 138.162.8.59. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
 * instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.  'Please read Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest guidelines before editing any articles related to the United States military or government to ensure you are in compliance. Thank you - the WOLF ' child  17:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.