User talk:138.75.14.77

March 2024
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Model United Nations. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Pilaz (talk) 01:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi 138.75.14.77! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.Pilaz (talk) 01:14, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Just FYI, Wikipedia has a policy of not allowing original research. All content should be verifiable and sourced. See WP:OR and WP:V. Your addition of unsourced commentary on MUNs in Singapore, without a source, constitutes OR. Please consider discussing the content here or on the article's talk page (Talk:Model United Nations). Thanks. Pilaz (talk) 01:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC)