User talk:138.88.248.199

December 2023
Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   21:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Talkpages aren't soapboxes for your views on commentators, candidates, or your personal analysis of the topic.  Acroterion   (talk)   21:04, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Great Replacement, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   00:59, 18 December 2023 (UTC)


 * And this isn't Simple Wikipedia. Talkpages aren't soapboxes.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:00, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:05, 18 December 2023 (UTC)


 * See own. I was discussing the content of the page. I'm not the one engaging in an edit war. So stop continously reverting my work, and logging in with different accounts to disguise that doesn't change anything.138.88.248.199 (talk) 01:28, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:47, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 19:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC)