User talk:139.216.189.7

THE ONLY USER THAT SHOULD BE TREATED LIKE A KING. I MAKE FINAL JUDGEMENTS, YOU PLEBS CAVE IN.

Daryl Hannah is a dumbass.

August 2018
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mike Ness have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 23:43, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mike Ness. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus  (talk to me) 03:55, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mike Ness, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:1C0:4401:24A0:F0A6:D2C4:275E:9E1A (talk) 03:56, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The edits I made about Mike Ness are factual and of a non-harrassing nature and should be delared as fact

October 2018
Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been [ disallowed by an edit filter.] If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 05:44, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

March 2019
Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been [ disallowed by an edit filter.] If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 10:45, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jay Hernandez, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Cassiopeia(talk) 06:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at George Takei. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: George Takei was changed by 139.216.189.7 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.908228 on 2021-03-06T06:34:14+00:00

George Takei deserves all the negative criticism he gets.

May 2023
Hello, I'm Moons of Io. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Bartholomew I of Constantinople have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Moons of Io (talk) 01:43, 27 May 2023 (UTC)


 * But he is a heretic. Everything about his heresies can be proven by searching up Youtube 139.216.189.7 (talk) 02:55, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Materialscientist. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Technopat (talk) 14:38, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Arthur EnGoron is a lizard. Not qualified to be considered a human. Lower than a rodent. 139.216.189.7 (talk) 03:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

A reminder that Arthur Engoron is going to have a very unpleasant next few years and few will be crying for his decline. His groomer behaviour will be leaked in the next few months 139.216.189.7 (talk) 04:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC)