User talk:139.59.9.196

June 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Cheap Thrills (song), you may be blocked from editing. ''Please discuss the issue. Also, please note that this article is set to "pending changes": your edits are NOT visible to readers unless confirmed by an established user.'' Sum mer PhD v2.0 12:50, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Calm down and please go to the talk page of Cheap Thrills.
 * WP:BRD applies. When you are reverted, discuss the issue. Restoring all or part of the disputed edit before achieving a consensus is disruptive. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 19:10, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

You are no exception too, when you are reverted, discuss the issue on the talk page rather getting involved in edit warrs and pointing fingers at everyone who disagrees with you. Vman20, for example. You are taking things too seriously. Chill.

Your recent editing history at Cheap Thrills (song) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''You boldly added synthesis. I reverted it. You then ignored WP:BRD. I reverted you to restore the prior WP:CONSENSUS version. You have now returned it to your bold version which was reverted and you decided did not need to be discussed. You can cite as many uncommunicative and sock editors as you wish. Our policies remain.'' Sum mer PhD v2.0 21:44, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * I have added a tag to the disputed text. If anyone happens to approve your pending changes, they will show with the warning that the text is disputed. Until then, my accepted version (without the "across Europe" claim) will be visible to anyone who reads the article. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 22:00, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

If that makes you sleep at night, of course.

Sockpuppet investigation
Sum mer PhD v2.0 23:43, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Cheap Thrills (song) has been reverted. Your edit here to Cheap Thrills (song) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nYh-n7EOtMA, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=31crA53Dgu0) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

July 2016
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for evading a previous block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 09:09, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.