User talk:13ab37

Please join WikiProject Women artists!
SarahStierch (talk) 16:55, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 16:55, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
More kittens!

Gretchenmcc (talk) 17:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC) 

Proposed deletion of Ruth Phillips


The article Ruth Phillips has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 20:15, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Sending you lots of WikiLove. Thanks for today! It was great meeting you :)

Thekidpossum (talk) 01:23, 8 March 2015 (UTC) 

at the EV building
I'll see you there on Saturday. Clandestine Secondary Account (talk) 20:44, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

The Let Down Reflex
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Let Down Reflex, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://nyevents.us/new-york-the-let-down-reflex/271199.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:29, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Let Down Reflex


A tag has been placed on The Let Down Reflex requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://nyevents.us/new-york-the-let-down-reflex/271199. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FA9295 (talk)  (contributions)  20:31, 4 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Making an entire article as a quote from a copyright source is copyvio. If you own the material, see WP:DCM.  DGG ( talk ) 02:07, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for responding. If you look at the article, you will see that the entire thing is not a quote, but rather there are two very short quotes. There is duplicate text because both pages list all of the artists in the show, but that is not plagiarism as there is no other way to list them. Please advise how to move forward. Thanks.  13ab37 ( talk ) 8:55, 5 March 2016 (EST)

AfC notification: Draft:Jacqueline Hoang Nguyen has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jacqueline Hoang Nguyen. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacqueline Hoang Nguyen (March 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacqueline Hoang Nguyen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jacqueline_Hoang_Nguyen Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:333-blue&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jacqueline_Hoang_Nguyen reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

333-blue 03:16, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacqueline Hoang Nguyen (March 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment they left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacqueline Hoang Nguyen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jacqueline_Hoang_Nguyen Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SwisterTwister&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jacqueline_Hoang_Nguyen reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  21:13, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacqueline Hoang Nguyen (April 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment they left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacqueline Hoang Nguyen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jacqueline_Hoang_Nguyen Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SwisterTwister&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jacqueline_Hoang_Nguyen reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  05:07, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacqueline Hoang Nguyen (November 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NewYorkActuary was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacqueline Hoang Nguyen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NewYorkActuary (talk) 15:06, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Event page
Hello, thanks for creating this page! I hope this event goes well. Just a recommendation - when you create an event like this, it's best to add categories for the event so it can be tracked (I've done this), and add it to the calendar and template. This allows people to find and track it, and also will likely increase the likelihood of remote support from experienced contributors who can correct mistakes on pages created and give feedback to new contributors. Hope this is helpful to you, let me know if any thoughts or questions. Blythwood (talk) 00:52, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Account creator granted
After reviewing your request for the "accountcreator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things: If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the account creator right. Happy editing! &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  03:22, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The account creator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
 * The account creator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the account creator right will result in its removal by an administrator.

Speedy deletion nomination of Julie Tremble


A tag has been placed on Julie Tremble requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Zazzysa (talk) 21:34, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Julie Tremble for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julie Tremble is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Julie Tremble until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zazzysa (talk) 11:20, 12 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for adding this article and for the others you have created or enhanced on women in culture. If you run into any further difficulties with your articles, please let me know. As a former inhabitant of Montreal, I try to support Wikipedia coverage whether in French or English.--Ipigott (talk) 16:26, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Ipigott, I appreciate it! --13ab37 (talk) 19:26, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Elise Gravel
Hi, I'm Mduvekot. 13ab37, thanks for creating Elise Gravel!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please review WP:EL and trim the list of External links.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 21:22, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Discussion
Hello! Jacqueline Hoang Nguyen has finally been published, after this discussion. If you're creating articles on women artists, the WIR talk page is an excellent place for supportive discussions, as evidenced by that link. 104.163.144.60 (talk) 03:39, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I second this. You're doing excellent work so far - hope you keep it up. And happy editing! -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:06, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Ser Amantio di Nicolao, I appreciate it! --13ab37 (talk) 19:27, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Any time. :-) -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 19:29, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red
Hi there, 13ab37. It's great to see you've become a member of Women in Red, especially as you are intimately involved in Art+Feminism. It's good to have your user name right at the top of our list of members. If you are helping to arrange the Canadian editathons this month, you might be interested in our Ten Simple Rules for Creating Women's Biographies. I also look forward to your creating more women's biographies yourself. Let me know if ever you need any help or experience any problems. You are of course always welcome to contribute to the WiR talk page. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:11, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Women in Focus Society (March 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Women in Focus Society and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Women in Focus Society, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and save.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Women_in_Focus_Society Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Heliosxeros&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Women_in_Focus_Society reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS message 05:09, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notification
TonyBallioni (talk) 22:11, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, sorry for the scary template, it is just to let you know that we have a special set of rules around biographies of living people and our policy that applies to them (WP:BLP). The issue on David McGimpsey is that the current consensus is that the accusations should not be a part of the article as per WP:BLPCRIME and because the reporting on it is based on one primary source (the CBC, which is high quality, but consensus is currently it isn't enough to include it under our policy.) This is because we are very conservative with our treatment of living persons, and typically a new report about an administrative investigation by an employer about criminal matters where no charges, much less a conviction, will not make it into a BLP except in exceptional circumstances. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:28, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi, TonyBallioni I appreciate your feedback. There is not just the one CBC article. Please see: https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/transcona-bred-prof-under-investigation-475620603.html http://theconcordian.com/2018/03/complaints-filed-two-creative-writing-professors/ http://theconcordian.com/2018/03/complaints-filed-two-creative-writing-professors/ Moreover, I believe that it is our role to challenge guidelines and policies, on and off of Wikipedia, which uphold the patriarchy and which make permissible the type of silencing of voices that has allowed perpetrators of sexual violence to continue unimpeded for so long. --13ab37 (talk) 19:10, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Except you make the assumption that he is actually a perpetrator of sexual violence, which Wikipedia considers a problem since he has not been convicted. Wikipedia is not here to right great wrongs. A report of one instance of opening an investigation by two papers (again, same instance), and then the paper of the university itself, are not enough to merit inclusion in the article. He is a private individual in the eyes of our BLP policy, and thus we are very cautious about what we include. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:16, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

How is a public intellectual a private individual, especially when considering that the allegations were made by his students? I understand the BLP policy and who it wants to protect and I urge you to understand how that same policy upholds implicit and explicit bias on this site and in society. --13ab37 (talk) 20:27, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! Sorry for writing in English. The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

--WMF Surveys (talk) 01:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 26% of Wikimramedia contributors who Wikimedia programs like the Education program, editathons, or image contests. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you are not fluent in English, I apologize again for posting in English. If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone.If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thank you! —WMF Surveys (talk) 17:18, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Wikimedia survey (corrected link)
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 26% of Wikimramedia contributors who Wikimedia programs like the Education program, editathons, or image contests. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed.Take the survey now.

If you are not fluent in English, I apologize for posting in English. If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! —WMF Surveys (talk) 17:24, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you are not a native speaker of English, I apologize for writing in English. '''If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again.''' We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thank you!! --WMF Surveys (talk) 05:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Women in Focus Society has been accepted
 Women in Focus Society, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Legacypac (talk) 10:50, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Women_in_Focus_Society help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Women in Red June Editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Proposed deletion of Siân Evans (librarian)


The article Siân Evans (librarian) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. References are single line mentions or examples of work."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dogsix (talk) 15:48, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Results from global Wikimedia survey 2018 are published
Hello! A few months ago the Wikimedia Foundation invited you to take a survey about your experiences on Wikipedia. You signed up to receive the results. The report is now published on Meta-Wiki! We asked contributors 170 questions across many different topics like diversity, harassment, paid editing, Wikimedia events and many others.

Read the report or watch the presentation, which is available only in English. Add your thoughts and comments to the report talk page. Feel free to share the report on Wikipedia/Wikimedia or on your favorite social media. Thanks!

-- EGalvez (WMF) 19:25, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Get ready for November with Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

URGENT: 2 weeks left to sign the new Wikimedia confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information
This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation.

This is a reminder to acknowledge and sign the new Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information. As you know, your volunteer role in Wikimedia projects gives you access to secure and sensitive information.

The new version includes one major change.


 * There is a change regarding the way personal data may be released. Accordingly, functionaries must notify the Wikimedia Foundation at check-disclosure@wikimedia.org before releasing data, in order to obtain a written approval for doing so. The Foundation will respond within 10 days. However, for emergencies, such as cases involving threats of violence, functionaries may release the personal data without such explicit permission, but they should notify the Foundation immediately following the disclosure. If they choose not to disclose the data, the request for disclosure should be forwarded to the Foundation's emergency email address (emergency@wikimedia.org).

There are also some wording changes that were made to more closely align the language with evolving industry norms, best practices and laws. The most notable of these has been the change of the term "nonpublic information" to "nonpublic personal data". None of these changes are intended to make fundamental changes to the scope or practice of the policy but we know they could appear as such, hence wanted to flag them.

The aforementioned changes require users that have already signed the previous version of the policy to sign the new version as well.

We therefore ask that you to sign the updated version. Signing the agreement is tracked on Phabricator's Legalpad. An online guide is available to help you with signing the agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign. If you wish you can sign it directly at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/L37. The exact policy is located here: Access to nonpublic personal data policy. The text of the confidentiality agreement is located here: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information

If you have already received this message and signed the updated agreement, you need not sign it again. Once is sufficient. In this case, we ask that you respond to Samuel (WMF) letting him know when (date) and how (method/process of signing) you have signed it so that we can update our own records.

Note: please bear in mind that if you still haven’t signed the updated version of the Confidentiality Agreement by February 13, 2019 your rights will be removed.

Thank you for your understanding,

Samuel Guebo (User:Samuel (WMF)), Wikimedia Foundation

''Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 17:49, 30 January 2019 (UTC)'

May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

June events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

July events from Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

October Events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:34, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Wikimedia and the Global Education Goals
Thanks! --13ab37 (talk) 13:23, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

December events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

WikiProject Women Notice
Please Add the New User Box and send the Invite to your Friends to Contribute to WikiProject Women. Regards.<b style="color:#6B8E23; font-family:Comic Sans MS"> Stalin Sunny</b>Talk2Me 09:05, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Recent account creations
Hi, I notice that you've created a lot of new accounts today. I've also noticed that for two of them, you entered an email address in the "reason" field, which is publicly logged, as such I've had to suppress those log entries. I must ask you to take much more care when creating accounts.On that note, I notice that you've created all of them today by specifying a password, which means you technically have knowledge of that password and thus the accounts you've created could be classed as compromised and blocked. I assume that this is for an outreach event, and as such you should be checking the "Use a temporary random password and send it to the specified email address" box when you create the account, which emails a temporary password to the user for their first login. I believe the outreach dashboard can also handle this for you, but I'm unfamiliar with it. I get notified of every single account which is created by a user holding +accountcreator without using this checkbox, so naturally today you've popped up no fewer than 21 times with a notification I rarely see.As a final point, I don't know why you've been granted the more sensitive +accountcreator right, when you asked for +eventcoordinator. I presume your work with outreach is planned to continue, so I hope you don't mind if I switch you over to the event coordinator right? Thanks! stwalkerster (talk) 22:28, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi - yup please switch me to Event coordinator! The accounts were created for a class context in which students were asked to create accounts at home and NONE did so. I didn't use the Outreach Dashboard, which I normally use to authorize accounts, because the work of creating an account was supposed to be done in advance and I follishly thought it would be. Thanks for checking in and sorry about the confusion! --13ab37 (talk) 21:09, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Come edit with Black Lunch Table!
{|style="background:#C7C7C7; border:2px solid #808080; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em; color:#000000;span style=color:black;border-radius: 8px;”


 * style="padding-left: .6em;" |
 * style="padding-left: .6em;" |

We haven't seen you in a while! There's many opportunities to get reacquainted with us during the month of July through our new programming. You are invited to play our monthly BINGO and win exciting prizes! This month, the first person to complete the BINGO card receives a copy of | Ralph Lemon: Modern Dance Series edited by Thomas J. Lax among other BLT goodies! Find the card, rules and more information | here.

Other upcoming events during Summer 2020 include:

 * 1) July 18: BLT: Bacon + Lettuce + Tomato at | bit.ly/blacklunchtablemeet
 * 2) July 19: Nikita Gale on Instagram Live | @blacklunchtable
 * 3) July 26: Topic Focus: WikiEDU for educators w/ Alexandria Lockett at | bit.ly/blacklunchtablemeet, SIGN-UP
 * 4) August 2: Jeff Sims on Instagram Live | @blacklunchtable
 * 5) August 9: Online Edit-a-thon at | bit.ly/blacklunchtablemeet
 * 6) August 15: BLT: Bacon + Lettuce + Tomato at | bit.ly/blacklunchtablemeet
 * 7) August 16: Thenjiwe Niki Nkosi on IG Live | @blacklunchtable
 * 8) August 23: Topic Focus: Spanish Language Edit-a-thon w/ Catherine Feliz at | bit.ly/blacklunchtablemeet
 * 9) August 30: Damon Locks on Instagram Live | @blacklunchtable

More about our new programming:
BLT: Bacon + Lettuce + Tomato: BLT has always sought to provide a space for communion, affirmation, and discourse and has been the reason for our roundtable series’. We recognize the extraordinary need for community spaces and see value in conversation as a space for catharsis and movement, of communication and resource. Meet virtual neighbors! Bring a bag brunch to your computer, take that short commute to your couch. Noon EST.

Sunday Artist Series on IG Live: Artists are central to all facets of BLT. As exhibitions and freelance work are canceled due to the virus, what we can do to support the continuation of the archive we depend on is ask and compensate artists as they share and commune with us through a series of online “talks”. Noon, EST. Find them on IG Live @blacklunchtable.

Topic Focus and Online Edit-a-thons: Join us for online Wikipedia editing and assistance. Help record history as it unfolds by updating related Wikipedia articles, editing know-how is not necessary. In addition to regular editing together, Topic Focus sessions we will feature experts on WikiEDU, editing on mobile devices, Wikidata, and Spanish language editing. All skill levels are welcome! Noon, EST.

Feel free to reach out to us for help at any time. See you soon!

Nikitag94 (talk) 21:31, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 * }

Nomination of Siân Evans (librarian) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siân Evans (librarian) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Siân Evans (librarian) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 23:31, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

September Women in Red edithons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

October editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

December with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Come edit with Black Lunch Table!
{|style="background:#C7C7C7; border:2px solid #808080; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em; color:#000000;span style=color:black;border-radius: 8px;”


 * style="padding-left: .6em;" |
 * style="padding-left: .6em;" |

Wrap 2020 up with BLT! Get reacquainted with editing at our next online Edit-a-thon on Sunday December 27th at 12PM EST at | bit.ly/blacklunchtablemeet. You are also invited to play our monthly BINGO and win exciting prizes! Find the card, rules and more information | here.

Other upcoming events include:

 * 1) February 10-13: College Art Association, Annual Conference, New York, NY
 * 2) Winter 2021: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Ricker Library of Architecture and Art

See you soon!

Nikitag94 (talk) 21:16, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 * }

A New Year With Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Come edit with Black Lunch Table at MoMA!
{|style="background:#C7C7C7; border:2px solid #808080; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em; color:#000000;span style=color:black;border-radius: 8px;”


 * style="padding-left: .6em;" |
 * style="padding-left: .6em;" |

As part of the programming for the MoMA's new exhibition Reconstructions: Architecture and Blackness in America, BLT is hosting an online Edit-a-thon! Get reacquainted with editing with us on Saturday May 22nd 2021 at 11AM EST. Register here! You are also invited to play our monthly BINGO and win exciting prizes, including a luxury stay at a 21c Hotel of your choosing! Find the card, rules and more information | here.

Other upcoming events include:

 * 1) May 16, 2021: BLT Live w/ Norman Teague on IG @blacklunchtable
 * 2) May 23, 2021: Monthly online edit-a-thon at | bit.ly/blacklunchtablemeet

See you soon!

Nikitag94 (talk) 02:40, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Priya Parker moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Priya Parker, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... disco spinster   talk  17:06, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks disco spinster  was about to move it myself, was giving a demo. Appreciate your quickness.

August Editathons at Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Concern regarding Draft:Priya Parker
Hello, 13ab37. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Priya Parker, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Priya Parker


Hello, 13ab37. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Priya Parker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 17:18, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

January 2022 Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Come edit with Black Lunch Table!
{|style="background:#C7C7C7; border:2px solid #808080; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em; color:#000000;span style=color:black;border-radius: 8px;”


 * style="padding-left: .6em;" |
 * style="padding-left: .6em;" |

We haven't seen you in a while! There's many opportunities to get reacquainted with us during through our upcoming programming. You are invited to play our bimonthly BINGO and win exciting prizes! Find the card, rules and more information | here.

Other upcoming events during Winter 2022 include:

 * 1) February 20: Office Hours on Zoom at noon EST;
 * 2) February 27: BLT: Live with Anisa Olufemi on IG Live at noon EST;
 * 3) February 27: Afrofuturist Period Room closing event online at 1PM EST;
 * 4) March 6: BLT: Live with Daonne Huff on IG Live at noon EST;
 * 5) Futurism Bingo until Feb 28th.

See you soon!

Nikitag94 (talk) 04:04, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

March editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:36, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May Women in Red events
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

June events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in July 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in August 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in September 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:33, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red November 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red December 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:52, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red January 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:59, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in February 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:51, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:50, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red May 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red - June 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:14, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red July 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red 8th Anniversary
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

September 2023 at Women In Red
--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red - November 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red December 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
<section begin="announcement-content" />
 * You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. 

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,<section end="announcement-content" />

RamzyM (WMF) 23:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red June 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red July 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging