User talk:13afuse

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Alexander Stafford
How did my edit constitute vandalism? Some of the material I removed was originally added myself (for example the part about his grandparents) for which the sources I used are no longer active and added new material. You have also made edits to the page in the past which were unsourced. I've edited a large deal of articles of MPs of all political colours and would prefer if my neutrality wasn't questioned. I have reversed your edits but included the information you added about support for a "green recovery" and his criticisms of Thatcher as this does add nuance to his views on her time in office. MotorsportFan2012 (talk) 13:06, 8 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello - it seemed as if certain details re: his background, local connections, university affiliations had been removed without explanation, hence why I said it "appeared to be vandalism". I did not look at your editing history, which would have shown that this was unlikely, so my apologies for misinterpreting your motives. I have restored that which was lost, where active sources have proven available to support it. 13afuse (talk) 15:21, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alexander Stafford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harthill. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 19 May 2022 (UTC)