User talk:14.0.174.28

Why is HKFP constantly editing out documented and verified with sources controversies? If they are editing and censoring their own wikipedia how can they keep the name Hong Kong free press. As they have repeatedly proven they censor.

February 2020
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Hong Kong Free Press. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 05:37, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Hong Kong Free Press. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GorillaWarfare (talk) 05:47, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.