User talk:14.200.140.93

April 2022
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Nasua, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 10:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Stink badger, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 10:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia uses the wp:COMMONNAME. Please link to the article's title and not through a scientific-name wp:redirect. Please don't be disruptive. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 10:24, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Vulpes, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 10:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Notice of edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Tremarctinae. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 10:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.