User talk:140.0.143.230

September 2021
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Ninja Diannaa (Talk) 14:15, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Useless, badly sourced, and unsuitable additions
I've had to remove or heavily alter about 95% of what you added to various "Largest" lists so far, and I'm growing tired of it. If you cannot make sure that you a) always provide sources, b) don't add contradictory or plain wrong information, c) don't add material that has no business being on the lists (second-largest, or something "just large" that apparently happened to catch your attention), and d) put a minimum of care into not slapping half-sentences and ungrammatical fragments into lists - I'm going to straight up undo your additions, without taking half an hour to sift through the rubbish for the odd usable bit. Please do this properly or not at all. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs)
 * Now you are adding random cryptids and mythological creatures to List of megafauna in mythology and folklore! Stop this! -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 23:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 * ... and now unsourced half-sentences to Largest prehistoric animals. Final warning - if you don't stop these disruptive edits, you will be reported. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 00:34, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Warnings don' work against the "Megafauna Man" vandal. Blocking does, albeit at a limited rate.--Mr Fink (talk) 16:53, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Fuzheado &#124; Talk 15:19, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:19, 14 October 2021 (UTC)