User talk:140.146.203.154

March 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at John Kricfalusi, you may be blocked from editing. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 18:39, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * You don't seem to understand. The information of John K. being the creator of Ren and Stimpy is plainly wrong and unsourced. There is somewhere in the rules that say that it requires a source, otherwise, it is plainly wrong.140.146.203.154 (talk) 18:41, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at John Kricfalusi. What hard evidence do you have that John K. isn't the creator of Ren and Stimpy? FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 18:47, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:09, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Regarding the burden of evidence
140.146.203.154 is normally correct about WP:BURDEN, and the onus is normally on to provide an inline citation that directly supports the statement. However, such citations are given in the article. I'm not adding a citation to the lead section because it would apply undue weight to the allegations discussed in the newspaper articles, but the references in the controversy-related section of the biography do directly support the claim. 140.146.203.154 would need to explain, ideally on the talk page of the article, why these references are not reliable. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:12, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Oswald Gracias. Elizium23 (talk) 18:47, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * But the info regarding Oswald Gracias is plainly false and unsourced!140.146.203.154 (talk) 18:49, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Code of Canon Law canon 1: The canons of this Code concern only the latin Church. That's the legal name for the entity colloquially known as the "Latin Rite" Elizium23 (talk) 18:51, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * It is still plainly wrong!140.146.203.154 (talk) 18:53, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * What do you mean, "plainly" wrong? Your opinion doesn't matter. Elizium23 (talk) 18:54, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * No reason it just is140.146.203.154 (talk) 18:55, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * "No reason" lolwat. Do me a favor, while you're blocked again. Type "Latin Rite" into the search box on Wikipedia and see where it goes. Then click the link on "Latin Church" and see what that's all about. And then after an honest reading of the documentation, tell me it's still "plain" to you. Elizium23 (talk) 18:57, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Hut 8.5  19:05, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.