User talk:140.211.14.197

I thought the lead section of the article was

[x] Clear and easy to understand

[x] Detailed

[ ] Fragmented

[ ] Had mistakes

[ ] Needs to be tied together better

[x ] Gives a good overview of the article

I thought the article’s structure was

[x ] Clear

[x ] Had several headings and subheadings arranged chronologically or by themes

[ ] Had images and diagrams when appropriate

[ ] sections about an important aspect of the topic are shorter than sections about a less important aspect

I thought the content

[ ] Covered many aspects of the topic

[x ] Gave more weight to important viewpoints and less weight to fringe ideas.

[ ] Included value statements like “the best” or “the most important”

[ ] Was written without bias toward a particular point of view

[x ] cited reliable sources throughout the article and as much as possible

[ ] included references to unnamed sources of information, such as "some people say," or "many believe"?

[x ] includes citation information from reliable publishers

[ ] includes citations from questionable websites or publishers who might like to push an agenda 140.211.14.197 (talk) 16:41, 20 March 2019 (UTC)