User talk:141.154.79.66

March 2024
Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Practical Pig without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Waxworker (talk) 01:18, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Hello, I'm Doniago. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Fatal Attraction have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. DonIago (talk) 17:44, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fatal Attraction. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hi 141.154.79.66! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Fatal Attraction several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. ''You're using the word 'spoiled' incorrectly here. Please discuss your concerns rather than simply reinserting your preferred text.''. DonIago (talk) 19:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)