User talk:141.226.11.54

January 2021
Hello, I'm Pulisi. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Red fox, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Pulisi (talk) 08:05, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm William Harris. I noticed that you added and changed content in an article, Dog breed, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. '' The Middle Eastern group (Afghan hound and saluki) were identified   "as being distinct from modern domestic dogs" - the Canaan dog was not identified as being distinct from modern domestic dogs. Please take care when editing.'' William Harris (talk) 08:55, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may have noticed that all the work you have done on Wikipedia articles has been reverted to its prior state by other editors. This is because you seem not to be aware that everything in Wikipedia requires attribution, even if you happen to be an international expert in a subject. Please read Verifiability for further explanation. Even if you have the time to spend making edits which are to be reverted, you must stop making them, as your fellow volunteer editors do not have unlimited time for monitoring you and undoing your work. Thank you.

A helpful message:

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for contributing edits that were made in good faith, but have been deemed not to contribute positively to the article. These edits have thus been reverted. Wikipedia's page on unacceptable additions may explain why. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

Some good links for newcomers are:
 * Help contents – the main help page.
 * Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to create your first article
 * Tutorial

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out the Teahouse, ask the Help Desk, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Once again, welcome! Quisqualis (talk) 21:42, 4 January 2021 (UTC) --Quisqualis (talk) 21:42, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tripoint. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.   &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 23:06, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tripoint, you may be blocked from editing.   &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 23:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Tripoint; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. RoxySaunders (talk) 00:28, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

January 2021Trying to change reality by changing Wikipedia is a losing strategy.
→ You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. --Quisqualis (talk) 20:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)