User talk:141.226.242.48

July 2021
Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bob Black, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 05:45, 18 July 2021 (UTC)


 * This information is already included further down in the article and is not covered in sources as being so defining of Black's career as to warrant mention in the lede paragraph. Note that, on Wikipedia, when text additions are reverted by another editor, the expectation is to discuss the issue rather than attempting to add it back unilaterally, which is seen as disruptive and will result in a block of editing privileges. czar  08:53, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Bob Black. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. czar 18:26, 30 July 2021 (UTC)