User talk:141.237.8.245

March 2022
Hello, I'm Dove's talk. I noticed that you recently removed content from Black Shuck without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dove&#39;s talk (talk) 18:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Evermoor Chronicles, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. lol1VNIO (talk &#8226; contribs) 19:31, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at The Evermoor Chronicles, you may be blocked from editing. lol1VNIO (talk &#8226; contribs) 19:34, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at The Curse of La Llorona. &#128156; melecie   talk  - 06:23, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on The Curse of La Llorona. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -KAP03 (Talk &#x2022;&#x20;Contributions &#x2022;&#x20;Email) 06:26, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:42, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.