User talk:141.241.26.20/Archive 1

This will be all the stuff on the Kingston Uni IP

October 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Prime minister has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Prime minister was changed by 141.241.26.20 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.909322 on 2014-10-31T14:23:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:23, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Prime minister. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Gilliam (talk) 14:26, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nathan Aké, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Nathan Aké was changed by 141.241.26.20 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854753 on 2014-10-31T14:50:33+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:50, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Varun Manian has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Varun Manian was changed by 141.241.26.20 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.914386 on 2015-01-22T16:26:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:26, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Hello, I'm K scheik. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Zohib Islam Amiri because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. &mdash; k_scheik  talk to me! 14:36, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2015
Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Robert B Mellor because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 21:59, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Concrete, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 19:41, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Hello, I'm Onel5969. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Squalidae because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:55, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to China–Pakistan Economic Corridor, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Clubjustin Talkosphere  15:09, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at China–Pakistan Economic Corridor, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Clubjustin Talkosphere  15:10, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Clubjustin Talkosphere  15:10, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at China–Pakistan Economic Corridor. Clubjustin Talkosphere  15:12, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at China–Pakistan Economic Corridor. Clubjustin Talkosphere  15:14, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Clubjustin Talkosphere  15:14, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Clubjustin Talkosphere  15:15, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at China–Pakistan Economic Corridor, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Clubjustin Talkosphere  15:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

ARBIPA sanctions alert
Kautilya3 (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to 2016 Kashmir unrest. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 14:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

WP:NPA
Please refrain from making personal attacks against other editors as you have done here. If you have a genuine complaint against me you should report it WP:ANI with proper evidence. I notice that I have informed you about ARBIPA sanctions. You need to be careful from now on. Pinging for additional advice. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:41, 25 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Neil is he your favorite admin? stop assisting socks and playing the victim and maybe you wont be called out. 141.241.26.20 (talk) 12:46, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
 * IP, the only way you're going to get traction is to stop admin shopping, register an account, get autoconfirmed, and then file an arbitration enforcement request complete with diffs. --Neil N  talk to me 14:19, 25 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Dear Neil, I have sent messages to admins who have dealt with Kautilya and his frivolous complaints about other users I could not care less about "admin shopping" as you put it. You may block me if it makes you feel better at least other users know there is more to this than what Kautilya states there to be. 141.241.26.20 (talk) 14:34, 25 July 2016 (UTC)