User talk:142.116.202.86

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello 142.116.202.86, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Gaels have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Gaels, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. * While putting quotation marks around the copied content technically'' takes care of some of the issues you've been warned about, there are still problems with the POV push and sourcing here, as well as using external links in the body. The edit you just repeated, IP, is too similar to what you've already been warned about by another admin. '' - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 18:07, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * What? I entered completely sourced information, taken directly from a valid academic source. Everything I entered is backed up by the genetic studies in the source provided. There is NO POV push. The only POV pushing is you. I entered a valid summary of information from a perfectly valid source. 142.116.202.86 (talk) 18:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Take your discussions about improving the article to article talk. I am not interested in debating your POV on user talk. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 18:48, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding badly-formatted content, as you did on Gaels. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''You are not properly formatting your additions, and you should take this to article talk. '' - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 18:51, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * Please explain how it is not "properly" formatted. It is paraphrased in a perfectly acceptable manner, with all the information taken directly from the studies. This is really ridiculous. I think you are only making these claims because you have a personal objection to the enormous evidence provided by genetic studies. 142.116.202.86 (talk) 18:53, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gaels of Scotland. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. You are destroying an article, not merging the contents The Banner  talk 20:00, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * What is wrong with you? Did you ever read the agreement to merge the article with Gaels? Most of the Gaels of Scotland article is original research and uncited. There is nothing there to move to the Gaels article. 142.116.202.86 (talk) 20:03, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gaels of Scotland, you may be blocked from editing. ''You really seem not to understand that "merging" is about moving content into another article. Merging is not the same as liquidating an article and destroying its contents as you are doing. '' The Banner  talk 20:16, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * 1) You are not an administrator. 2) You are committing vandalism all over by reverting without explanation. 3) It was agreed in the Afd for Gaels of Scotland to merge with the Gaels article, but not keep really anything from the article because it is almost entirely original research and has no valid citations. 142.116.202.86 (talk) 20:22, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Irish people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. The Banner talk 20:57, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Talk:Irish people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. The Banner talk 20:58, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019
It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on Irish people, may have introduced material that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When adding material that may be controversial, it is good practice to first discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. The Banner talk 13:59, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

There is nothing entered there that was controversial. The findings of highly respected academic studies from the foremost experts in the field is not "controversial". You personally finding something controversial just because you have an unqualified disagreement with it is not a reason to make reversion according to WP. 142.116.202.86 (talk) 14:02, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Canary Islanders. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Angus1986 (talk) 17:40, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 142.116.202.86, has made edits that do not conform to our policies and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider [ getting a username] to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:
 * Help contents – the main help page.
 * Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 21:59, 6 January 2020 (UTC)