User talk:142.116.50.224

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions to Marathon&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! HiLo48 (talk) 02:07, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tamil Canadians, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Meters (talk) 06:16, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Suresh Joachim article
edit (and similar ones preceding it) seems to contain a lot of unreferenced information that may not be reliably sourced, and which tends to promote the person who is the subject of the article. Would you please explain, either here or on the article's discussion page, how it will be possible to improve the text you reverted? (As you are probably aware, unacceptable material will tend to be removed, and it is not acceptable to repeatedly restore it without discussion.) TheFeds  19:01, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Suresh Joachim, you may be blocked from editing. Sahaib (talk) 00:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * You've been warned before, you can't add unsourced information to a person article as you keep trying to do at Suresh Joachim, do so again will lead to you being blocked.— NZFC  (talk) (cont)  01:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm NZFC. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Suresh Joachim have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. — NZFC  (talk) (cont)  02:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Suresh Joachim. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — NZFC  (talk) (cont)  02:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Suresh Joachim, you may be blocked from editing. — NZFC  (talk) (cont)  02:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Suresh Joachim. — NZFC  (talk) (cont)  02:25, 10 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Information icon4.svg There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Issue with editors on Suresh Joachim. Thank you. TheFeds  03:46, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, 142.116.50.224. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Suresh Joachim, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. — NZFC  (talk) (cont)  02:27, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Suresh Joachim, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 04:27, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Suresh Joachim. – 2 . O . Boxing  02:23, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Suresh Joachim. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. –  2 . O . Boxing  02:23, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.