User talk:142.162.17.70

March 2024
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Concrete mixer, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. For your summary: Sometimes they are the reason they visit the WIkipedia article. Waylon (was) (here) 17:48, 27 March 2024 (UTC)


 * You will notice that I did, in fact, provide a valid reason for removal in the edit summary. If someone truly needs to know how Taskmaster contestants used a cement mixer, there are better sources than an uncited list of cruft tacked onto the Wikipedia article for "Cement mixer". They could, for example, reference the Wikipedia article for "Taskmaster (TV series)", or, since such detailed information is irrelevant cruft there also, they could check an independent Taskmaster wiki. Nobody is coming to Cement mixer for Supernatural timestamps or magic tricks either. It is not encyclopedic information and it does not belong in the article. 142.162.17.70 (talk) 18:03, 27 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I agree with the edit and the reasons spelled out in the edit summary. Maybe my own edit summary  will help flesh out the argument for getting rid of it.   signed, Willondon (talk)  18:15, 27 March 2024 (UTC)