User talk:142.170.60.247

March 2024
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Stateless nation. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 19:44, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * That's 100% what I was trying to do, calm the game down so that everyone goes to the talk page instead and reach a consensus there rather than just delete swathes of pages on a whim according to how they feel it should be (rather than the current result made by many efforts of previous users. Reverting acts of emotionally-charged removals of whole swathes of the page on a whim by users with no presence on the talk page compared to me, users with histories of bans or accounts seemingly made to do just that one edit. If I were to revert a revert, now you'd be right to say I'm on a edit war, and to punish me accordingly, but this is anti-sabotage work by users who don't use the talk page. Frankly, the bad faith is palpable. I actually contributed positively to the page, improved the Inuit section, engaged in the talk page, they just reverted stuff. I even asked politely what talk page they were reffering to, I expected them there, they never came. But regardless of any of that, it's all ignored for "IP bad, Users good", they didn't get a single hint of punishment for just deleting sourced parts of pages without any prior consensus made on the talk page firsthand. This has zero thing to do with being right or not, such big changes should go to the talk page, yet they don't. Please go read what was written, see who encourages the use of the talk page and not caring about being right, thank you. 142.170.60.247 (talk) 23:44, 26 March 2024 (UTC)