User talk:142.21.15.116

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Time, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Time was changed by 142.21.15.116 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-01-15T18:47:15+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:47, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=561790057 your edit] to College of American Pathologists may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:53, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * {med-org-stub}\

Hello, I'm Faizan. I noticed that you recently made an edit to College of American Pathologists that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fai zan  07:56, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm Fluffernutter. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Pathology without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 14:04, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Pathology. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 17:25, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anusha Samaranayake
Hi. Please note that everything you add to a biography of a living person must be sourced and the burden is with YOU to provide these sources. Thanks.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 17:31, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Please STOP making unsourced changes to this article. If you continue, then you face being blocked for disruption. Please reply here to state you understand this. Thanks.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 17:34, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Anusha Samaranayake; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -A la d insane  (Channel 2)  17:38, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. -A la d insane (Channel 2)  17:48, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

From edit summaries
The burden of proof is upon you to provide sources. The information CANNOT be in the article without sources. Do NOT revert my edit. Instead, take the text of "your" version in the "edit" window, click "Cite" in the toolbar, and fill out the boxes. Then click Save and Publish. I also will inform you that you are breaking a serious rule by continuing to revert; stop now and do not edit the article without adding reliable, published sources. -A la d insane (Channel 2)  17:53, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ GB fan 18:07, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.