User talk:142.227.202.149

You have been from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Bibliography has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:14, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Bibliography constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:27, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Bibliography. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:27, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Bibliography. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:28, 26 January 2011 (UTC) (ESkog)(Talk) 17:29, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

February 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dalhousie Mountain, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dalhousie Mountain was changed by 142.227.202.149 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960803 on 2012-02-09T17:09:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:09, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at War memorial. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bilby (talk) 13:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to War memorial with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. andy4789 ★ ·  (talk?   contribs?)  13:15, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to War memorial. andy4789 ★ ·  (talk?   contribs?)  13:18, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at War memorial shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. andy4789 ★ ·  (talk?   contribs?)  13:23, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.