User talk:142.245.193.4

This is your only warning. Your recent vandalism is sufficiently serious to warrant a block. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Compu te  r  Jo  e 19:07, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

May 2006
You have recently vandalized a Wikipedia article, and you are now being asked to stop this type of behavior. You're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.

In addition to the above guidelines, I have a few suggestions for you if you want to continue editing here:
 * 1) Do not make massive edits as an anonymous editor. Until you have learned the ropes of editing, there is no reason for you to make more than one or two edits in a row on the same article. Slow down and learn how to do it right.
 * 2) To that end, do not change things you don't understand. If you want to see how a change you have made will look, hit the "Show preview" button, not the "Save page" button. If you save edits that look like experiments or vandalism you may be punished quickly - possibly before you have a chance to fix them.
 * 3) Never delete sections of talk pages. Those are records of past discussions that may answer questions for future users. Deleting talk pages is always considered vandalism.
 * 4) On the same note, if you want to make a change, discuss it on the talk page. You can ask questions and get advice on how to make the change you want, and find out if it is inappropriate.
 * 5) I strongly suggest you register with a user name and sign in before you edit. Your constructive edits are more likely to be appreciated if you have a user name. IP addresses make people suspicious, and some of your edits are a perfect example of why that is.

Here are a few links you might find useful:
 * User tutorial
 * Help desk
 * Policy on maintaining a neutral point of view
 * Policy for content when editing articles and creating new ones

If you want to continue editing here, I hope you will create an account and take it seriously. You don't get very many chances before punishments begin to be handed down. I'm looking forward to seeing your contributions, and if you have any questions, feel free to contact me for help. Kafziel 19:25, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Nickelback, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. HawkerTyphoon 20:10, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Chicken fingers on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --T-rex 01:43, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

September 2011
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Hill Street Blues. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.  RepublicanJacobite  TheFortyFive 03:57, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Simple Kapadia, you may be blocked from editing.  RepublicanJacobite  TheFortyFive 03:58, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Terrell Suggs, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 20:58, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=560768562 your edit] to Genius may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:25, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * or originality, typically to a degree that is associated with the achievement of unprecedented insight. There is no scientifically precise definition of genius, and the question of whether the

July 2013
Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Anti-Bullying Day, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lugia2453 (talk) 18:26, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2016
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Tasmanian devil ‎ , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 02:42, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

June 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at American alligator. 100.2.98.246 (talk) 20:42, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Washington Times. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TheConnorMan (talk) 14:41, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2019
Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I noticed that in this edit to Aditya Singh Rajput, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jusdafax (talk) 09:44, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
Hello, I'm AntiCedros. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Red pill and blue pill—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. AntiCedros (talk) 18:10, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Red pill and blue pill. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AntiCedros (talk) 18:11, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Kathleen Taylor (business executive) has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 18:44, 14 September 2022 (UTC)