User talk:143.188.101.65

November 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Euryalus 05:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Michael J. Todd
Please stop. If you continue to add defamatory content, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Warthog Demon  01:40, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Clown has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Chasingsol(talk) 03:18, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. HarlandQPitt (talk) 06:06, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Vang Vieng appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Zachlipton (talk) 05:27, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Vang Vieng, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please stop. You are welcome to make constructive improvement to articles, but calling a place "disgusting" is not ok. Facts need to be backed by citations to reliable sources. Thanks.'' Zachlipton (talk) 05:30, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:20, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

NPOV Noticeboard
Wanted to let you know that there is a discussion regarding your edits to Vang Vieng at Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard. Thank you. Zachlipton (talk) 19:13, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

January 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Vang Vieng with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vang_Vieng&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ankit Maity  Talk 09:32, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Regarding your edit summary "Sean Hoyland you are ignorant. Just because someone edits a page in a way you dont like, you think it is vandalism. It is actually far more accurate.You think you know it all but you don't.". I live in Thailand, I know Laos quite well, so please don't make statements about editors based on assumptions about the nature of the editor. Stick to discussing the content and adding content that comes from sources that qualify as WP:RS. If you want to contribute to Wikipedia you have to follow the policies just like everyone else. WP:V is a mandatory policy. You must comply with it. No choice.  Sean.hoyland  - talk 09:48, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vang Vieng, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. You need to go on the talk page and discuss this if you don't want to get blocked. -- Eraserhead1 &lt;talk&gt; 23:13, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Beef, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000  22:12, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2012
Hello, I'm Mr. Vernon. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Mr. Vernon (talk) 01:26, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

July 2013
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Australia), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. I am One of Many (talk) 06:39, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=563443602 your edit] to Philippus Baldaeus may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:19, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * the Tamil language was groundbreaking.  He had rudimentary knowledge in his own words  "He probably did not know much more than the alphabet".

April 2014
Hello, I'm Apparition11. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Tanning because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 02:13, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eupatorieae. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Aurato (talk) 04:48, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017
Hello, I'm Gobonobo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to God bless you have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. gobonobo + c 00:29, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Instant coffee seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   00:31, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Johnny Bravo— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 02:40, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Recent edit to Vang Vieng
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Vang Vieng without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Dan Koehl (talk) 23:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Hello, I'm Orphan Wiki. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Leyland brothers— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk or my talk page. Thank you. Orphan Wiki 20:49, 31 July 2018 (UTC)