User talk:143.231.249.130

October 2017
Hello, I'm DatGuy. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Democratic Socialists of America— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Empire Strikes Back. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 19:58, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Fantasy, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 14:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Steve King. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Steve King was changed by 143.231.249.130 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951487 on 2017-10-27T19:12:56+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:13, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at False attribution, you may be blocked from editing. WaggersTALK  14:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cop. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Cop was changed by 143.231.249.130 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.969793 on 2017-11-09T15:17:52+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:17, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:29, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   14:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

November 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Donald Trump–Russia dossier has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:20, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Donald Trump–Russia dossier was changed by 143.231.249.130 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873001 on 2017-11-21T16:19:59+00:00.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 11:48, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. AnAwesomeArticleEditor (talk) 17:25, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

April 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to List of Bethesda Softworks video games— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 17:14, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Lindsey Graham. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 21:14, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2018
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 21:33, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

October 2019
Hello, I'm Creffett. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Greg Murphy (politician) have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. creffett (talk) 23:56, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Pelosi quote in Trent Kelly
I've re-added the Nancy Pelosi quote you removed from Trent Kelly as "subjective". While Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy does indeed mean that Wikipedia itself wouldn't make the claims Pelosi made. But the fact that Wikipedia itself won't espouse any particular viewpoint doesn't mean we can't describe other people's viewpoints where they are noteworthy. There's a difference between Wikipedia disagreeing with Kelly—a matter of opinion—and Wikipedia stating the fact that Pelosi disagrees with Kelly.

Politicians don't exist in a vacuum, and where a notable politician has views on another politician's actions, those are quite possibly (though not necessarily) worth mentioning in the article.

Finally, I should note that, based on your IP address, it seems likely that you are Kelly or one of his staffers. Wikipedia editors often take a dim view of articles being edited by people with a connection to their subject. I would strongly encourage you to disclose your affiliation with Kelly in future edits, and request that uninvolved editors make changes on your behalf rather than making them yourself; for more detail on this, see the conflict of interest policy and plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Gaelan 💬✏️ 20:52, 3 May 2021 (UTC)