User talk:143.254.201.229

April 2015
Hello, I'm NeilN. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Thesis statement because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Neil N  talk to me 22:15, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Assassination of Julius Caesar— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   21:36, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Assassination of Julius Caesar. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:39, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Assassination of Julius Caesar was changed by 143.254.201.229 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.887247 on 2016-03-22T21:39:22+00:00.

February 2017
Hello, I'm 172.58.40.103. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Amulet: The Stonekeeper have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 172.58.40.103 (talk) 00:50, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.58.40.103 (talk) 00:50, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

April 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Roman aqueduct. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Meters (talk) 21:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia, like you did at Roman aqueduct ‎. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia '''you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''' Meters (talk) 22:00, 4 April 2018 (UTC)