User talk:144.122.30.134/archive

Dear Friends,

Thank you for unblocking my access. My main reason for removing some parts of the article is just to make it objective and concise. I do not have enough time to finish the editing cause of the blocking. Otherwise, i strongly agree that the Wikipedia should contain objective information with references. Wikipedia should no be a propaganda archive!

144.122.30.134

UNBLOCK

Dear Friends,

I just tried to cleanup the subjective information which has given without any references. That page contains controversial statements without any citations. I was adding some paragraphs based on official pages and books, and deleting the controversial statements which does not have any references. The wikipedia service should be objective. If you block editing how it can be improved? Do you prefer it to be full of disputed articles. I think it is time to unblock my access.

144.122.30.134

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Bertilvidet 11:27, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. --&mdash; Khoikhoi 19:01, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Turkish Army. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. (|--  UlT i MuS  10:30, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during August 27 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Ryūlóng 10:33, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. abakharev 10:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Following our E-mail exchange I am unblocking you. You promised not to blank a part of the page (it appeares to be a software bug anyway) and not to create a POV fork. Happy editing abakharev 12:13, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

PLEASE STOP
Your source does not show any figures as far as you know. Wikipedia is not a propaganda forum. Please give up that your behaviour. Thanks. Kachik 15:58, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

You have to cite your source firstly. I have given the clear source. Kachik 16:10, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Turkish Navy
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. - Tangot a ngo 16:18, 27 August 2006 (UTC)