User talk:144.202.134.130

December 2017
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Amistad (film), you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 21:42, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Marcus Garvey
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Marcus Garvey. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 16:42, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

January 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Fairfield, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. James (talk/contribs) 15:35, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Roman Republic‎;, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''Some of your edits added punctuation marks where they weren't needed. Other edits were redundant, as they added information that was already given. Encyclopedic style is clear, precise, and avoids redundancies '' Haploidavey (talk) 12:56, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''Please read and apply the advice given in WP:MOS, and particularly the style recommended by WP:ERA. We don't insert punctuation marks between B and C in "BC" '' Haploidavey (talk) 13:05, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please take note of the above warnings about the Manual of Style. In particular, don't add ordinals to dates per MOS:DATE. clpo13(talk) 18:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Please stop adding unsourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:18, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Dunbar High School (Washington, D.C.). John from Idegon (talk) 23:42, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Dunbar High School (Washington, D.C.). John from Idegon (talk) 21:31, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Abell (surname)
Hi there - I have reverted your edit to the surname page about Arunah Shepherdson Abell, on the grounds that this page is just a list of people with basic details about their notability - no need to go into details that are on the linked page. Best wishes, Tacyarg (talk) 22:24, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Hello. Your recent edit to George Abell appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 22:27, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in The Baltimore Sun, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''That includes things like using curvy-parentheses rather than square-brackets for side comments (MOS:BRACKET). Please also get in the habit of using an edit-summary to explain each of your edits. For example, by looking at, you can see each of my edits is explained, and that way you can learn about why some changes are made that you might not expect.'' DMacks (talk) 12:22, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The Oprah Winfrey Show, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Digifan23 (talk) 01:35, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Western High School (Baltimore), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 22:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 10:25, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

And please stop adding unnecessary parenthetical detail to articles relating to Yellowstone National Park. Grant's term in office really doesn't need to be discussed.  Acroterion   (talk)   11:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 06:56, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to English Civil War, changing content so that it does not conform to the title of the article in line with the Manual of Style, is nonconstructive and has been reverted. It also does not conform with the generally used title for the conflict. Please use the edit summary to explain changes to articles; refer to the talk page and explain changes in more detail there, if necessary. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:38, 8 September 2018 (UTC)


 * There are procedures for changing the title of articles if that is appropriate. For information on page move procedures, see Moving a page, and Requested moves.


 * Helpful information about editing Wikipedia can be found on various Wikipedia guideline and policy pages including: Help:Getting started; Introduction; Simplified ruleset; Simplified Manual of Style; Referencing for beginners; Identifying reliable sources; Citing sources; Help:Footnotes; Verifiability; No original research; Neutral point of view; Notability; Biographies of living persons; What Wikipedia is not; Manual of Style/Words to watch; Help:Introduction to talk pages; Copyright Problems and Help:Contents. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:38, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Anne, Queen of Great Britain, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Much of the material you added is wrong (e.g. that Elizabeth II was born in 1927 and is a member of the house of Hanover). DrKay (talk) 06:53, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on English Civil War. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Again, you have introduced errors, such as claiming that William III of Orange was a duke. DrKay (talk) 06:55, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at William III of England. Someone born in 1650 is clearly not 17 in 1677. DrKay (talk) 09:02, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for continuing to add unsourced content. There are many warnings, requests to desist, and offers to assist on this talk page. You've ignored them all and not posted to any talk pages or requested clarification. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DrKay (talk) 17:42, 8 September 2018 (UTC)