User talk:145.102.243.118

May 2022
Hello, I'm Sirdog. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Charles Lyell—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. — Sirdog (talk) 09:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Charles Lyell. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Sirdog (talk) 09:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello, I'm ButterCashier. I noticed that you recently removed content from Charlotte Perkins Gilman without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ButterCashier (talk) 10:06, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Charlotte Perkins Gilman. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. -- NotC hariza rd 🗨 09:35, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Charlotte Perkins Gilman. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:40, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Charlotte Perkins Gilman was changed by 145.102.243.118 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966336 on 2022-09-27T09:40:17+00:00

October 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Slang have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:30, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Slang was changed by 145.102.243.118 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951571 on 2022-10-11T09:30:44+00:00