User talk:145.102.243.130

February 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Creation myth. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jeb3 Talk at me here What I've Done 13:13, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Creation myth, you may be blocked from editing. Tgeorgescu (talk) 13:29, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Creation myth shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Tgeorgescu (talk) 13:29, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2020
Hello, I'm Blablubbs. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Desert ecology—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 12:43, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. CLCStudent (talk) 12:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2020
Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to First Fleet have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. ---Rdp060707 (Talk/My fight against the devil/contributions) 13:29, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Cece Bell—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 13:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mohammed Hafez have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:14, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mohammed Hafez was changed by 145.102.243.130 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886327 on 2021-09-14T11:14:07+00:00

December 2021
Hello, I'm Melecie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Tokyo have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. melecie  t  - 13:30, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tokyo. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:30, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tokyo was changed by 145.102.243.130 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916834 on 2021-12-13T13:30:34+00:00

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. 2601:240:CD08:8C1:7CB6:BEC:87DF:BC64 (talk) 13:33, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Sickle cell disease, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:00, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sickle cell disease. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:00, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sickle cell disease, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 15:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sickle cell disease. DoebLoggs (talk) 15:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Flevoland have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:56, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Flevoland was changed by 145.102.243.130 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931923 on 2023-04-05T10:56:21+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Flevoland. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ButterCashier (talk) 11:02, 5 April 2023 (UTC)