User talk:146.115.112.97

Why is a reference to the funding sources for a publication "non-constructive?" This is very important in understanding potential bias and many folks wouldn't even know of these disclosures if it is not put in the article itself. Many signfigant misuses of the the scientifc publishing process along these lines have recently come to light. Look at the publishing surrounding the cigerette and tobacco industries.

More specifically, see: https://www.kqed.org/stateofhealth/236447/sugar-industry-funded-1960s-harvard-research-that-blamed-heart-disease-on-fat

Do you have any suggestions on how to make this more in line with Wikipedia's standards?

Without further feedback, I think this edit was very constructive.