User talk:146.196.34.173

April 2022
Hello, I'm Victor Trevor. I noticed that in this edit to Devyani Khobragade, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Victor Trevor ( talk ) 15:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello Victor,
 * This edit was mandated as the content falsely maligns image of a serving Indian Foreign Service officer in the US.
 * The said officer was framed for charges of paying lower wages to her maid while it was mostly a prior conspiracy to directly arrest the officer and conduct a cavity search. Further details are in the article here https://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-envoy-gets-4120-per-month-us-says-pay-nanny-4500-1934791.
 * Since this was not a case of US visa fraud but labour code violation.
 * Second part of the news relates to Devyani's( officer) father who was a civil servant under whom it is alleged a corruption took place in Adarsh society. The content mischievously relates Devyani to the scam. While the courts in India have closed the Adarsh corruption case without acknowledging any role of her father.
 * Thus the content was malicious in nature to specifically carry out a targeted Character assassination of the officer. There is no mention of the officers good work in the entire page where she took numerous social causes and helped people for under priviliged background if different ways.
 * Also would like to highlight the Officer comes for Dalit community in India who are treated a Lower castes by the majoritarian community. They are often seen as non meritorious people taking up top jobs but who are corrupt and incapable of being at the top. Such Wikipedia pages help in others and creating a bias in minds of general public.
 * Kindly help with removal of this malicious content as I would be coming up with more positive content backed up by facts and which would present a complete picture of the half cooked accusations applied in the wiki page. 146.196.34.173 (talk) 15:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC)