User talk:146.198.12.235

June 2018
Hello, I'm TheFrog001. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Ashford Carbonell seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TheFrog001 - Talk to me! 07:55, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Ashford Carbonell. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. You have been warned about this many times over 20 months.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 08:29, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Ashford Carbonell, you may be blocked from editing.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 09:18, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding persistant POV about speed limits. The thread is Ashford Carbonell. The discussion is about the topic Ashford Carbonell.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 09:25, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   10:12, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Ashford Carbonell. I have raised this again at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 11:56, 10 June 2018 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. - Donald Albury 13:04, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. - Donald Albury 16:03, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Donald Albury 21:13, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.