User talk:146.74.60.99

January 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Erika Stewart, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yamaguchi%E5%85%88%E7%94%9F&action=edit&amp;section=new Yamaguchi先生] 23:38, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2015
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Katz v. United States because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 17:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Google Glass has been reverted. Your edit here to Google Glass was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fped.2017.00145/full) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:36, 5 July 2017 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

August 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jeremy Hunt has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:34, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jeremy Hunt was changed by 146.74.60.99 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858941 on 2017-08-21T00:34:46+00:00.

Recent edit to Ghost Festival
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ghost Festival, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 01:40, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ethnic groups in Cambodia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 15:39, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 21:21, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, I'm Operator873. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jawed Karim have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Operator873 CONNECT 22:12, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Mongol conquest of China, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:57, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mongol invasions of Vietnam, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   16:01, 15 November 2017 (UTC)