User talk:147.10.206.176

July 2021
Hello, I'm SunDawn. I noticed that in this edit to Philip Lawn, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SunDawn (talk) 12:10, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Philip Lawn.   WesGeek (talk) 21:51, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Philip Lawn shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 331dot (talk) 00:48, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Philip Lawn
Hello. I saw that you'd edited the article about Philip Lawn and in your edit summary you said that you are that person. It said that someone had created an article about you without your permission. Anyone can create an article on Wikipedia, and if they create a biography about someone they don't need that person's permission. If some of the information in the article is inaccurate then please see WP:AUTOPROB for how to deal with it. However if the information isn't inaccurate then please do not remove it. I saw you'd changed some of the wording, such as referring to the person by their first name, however Wikipedia has a house style that articles should follow, and one of those standards is MOS:SURNAME which says that after the first mention of the person we refer to them by their surname. I hope this helps - please reply below if you need help. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:17, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

As you have a clear conflict of interest you need to request changes to the article via its talk page rather than edit it directly. Statements you make about Lawn / yourself need to be verifiable via inline references that clearly indicate where the statement can be checked against a reliable, independent source. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 07:12, 5 July 2021 (UTC)


 * In addition, anyone is welcome to edit the article; you cannot order others to not edit it, nor can you lock it to the text that you might prefer. 331dot (talk) 00:49, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Philip Lawn) for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 331dot (talk) 00:51, 17 July 2021 (UTC) Please read the messages on this page, as well as WP:OWN and WP:AUTO. 331dot (talk) 00:51, 17 July 2021 (UTC)