User talk:147.161.167.71

Trinitatis Horribilis
Hi! I have reverted your reversion concerning the section about sexual harassment in 2015 at Somerville College, Oxford. The edit summary is too short to explain why. The event in question is in my opinion not of enduring notability (nor can I find any verifiable sources which support that), nor was it put into encyclopaedic context (see WP:NOTNEWS). The section of this isolated event (added not long after the media coverage, probably by a student with an invented section title which was corrected years later) is in my opinion also clearly disproportionate to its overall significance to the article (see WP:PROPORTION). Also, please do not make any personal attacks by falsely accusing me of whitewashing, nor by implying that the murder of Sarah Everard had anything to do with my edit (which isn't even possible as at the time of my edit on 6 March she was still missing). Feel free to start a discussion on the talk place if you think it's necessary to ask the opinions of other editors. Best wishes, Aivin G. (talk) 20:26, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

July 2024
Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Saxon Earley have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. GiantSnowman 17:35, 8 July 2024 (UTC)