User talk:147.4.36.73

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Deli nk (talk) 12:38, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Close paraphrasing and copyright concerns
Hello. An editor using this IP address added sourced material to Women in ancient Rome. Some of this material was a very close paraphrasis of its source, if not an outright copyright violation. I've changed the article text to conform with copyright requirements, but please read Wikipedia's policies on copyrights, copyright violations and close paraphrasing. Please also note that most of the material added was already covered in a different section, cited to a different author. It's best to avoid repetitions in article text. It's essential that editors avoid copyright violations. Thanks for reading this. Haploidavey (talk) 23:14, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Hello, I'm Ifnord. Your recent edit to the page Toad (Nintendo) appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 22:19, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2022
Your edit to Early modern period has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 11:54, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Sigma Alpha Epsilon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. —C.Fred (talk) 17:53, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sigma Alpha Epsilon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:51, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

May 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at WWE event articles, like Elimination Chamber (2022). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — JDC808   ♫  21:22, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello, I'm --WikiUser1234945--. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Matt Schlapp—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 13:44, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Hello, I'm GabberFlasted. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Morning Show (American TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GabberFlasted (talk) 16:52, 5 December 2023 (UTC)